Face

Cate Malek
Research Assistant, Conflict Research Consortium
University of Colorado
Based on a longer essay on Face by Sarah Rosenberg for the Intractable Conflict Knowledge Base Project


Definition:

The familiar term is "saving face," which means not humiliating others in public, or taking preventive actions so that you, yourself will not be humiliated.

Users:

Anyone trying to negotiate or resolve a conflict, especially one in which the potential for humiliation or embarrassment of one (or more) of the parties is significant.

Description:

Face is understood as the image one projects of oneself or one's nation in a public forum. Understanding face is vital to any conflict management process. Sometimes disputants want so badly to save face that this overshadows all the other issues in the conflict. Depending on the culture you are dealing with, face has different levels of importance. In societies that highly value the concepts of shame and honor, such as Korea, China, and Japan in Asia, Middle-Eastern countries such as Egypt and Iran, and Latin American countries. face is extremely important. People dislike confrontation, and often avoid saying "no." Evasion and inaccuracy are preferred to keep appearances pleasant. Being humiliated before the group can be a fate worse than death.

In Western, more individualistic societies, confrontation is seen as acceptable, and does not necessarily reflect badly on the people involved. Conflicts are seen as a natural part of life. If one commits a social blunder, there is no group shame involved, only personal embarrassment. But such embarrassment is still uncomfortable, and people still do not like to admit mistakes, if they don't have to. So trying to find a way to solve a conflict without emphasizing that one side or the other was wrong is often helpful for conflict resolution.

Face-threatening acts will most likely lead to more of the same in any culture. When face-threatening moves are deemed necessary, the chances for a successful negotiation increase when there is a good balance of face-honoring moves as well.

Examples:

One perspective on the Cuban missile crisis put forth by a leading researcher on face theories, Stella Ting-Toomey, is that the negotiation came down to how both sides could retreat to peaceful positions without losing face. The correspondence between the two leaders (Kennedy and Khrushchev), shows they were trying to figure out how they could both retain honor with each other and in the international arena. Kennedy wrote about the seven lessons he learned during the crisis, number six being, "Don't humiliate your opponent," which is a central face issue.

Application:

Whenever a conflict puts one or more of the parties in danger of humiliation, opponents should consider ways in which their needs can be met while allowing the other side to save face.

Links to Related Articles:
Culture and Conflict
 
CRInfo Version VI
Copyright © 1999-2007 The Conflict Resolution Information Source
CRInfo™ is a Registered Trademark of the University of Colorado

Project Acknowledgements

The Conflict Resolution Information Source
Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess, Co-Directors
c/o Conflict Information Consortium (Formerly Conflict Research Consortium), University of Colorado
Campus Box 580, Boulder, CO 80309
Phone: (303) 492-1635; Fax: (303) 492-2154; Contact

University of Colorado at Boulder
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy. -- Martin Luther King, Jr.

Featured Links
Organizations Making Noteworthy Contributions to Conflict Resolution and Peace:
Global Process Institute (GPI)
Global Process Institute (GPI)


Partner Projects
CRInfo mini-grant recipients, gateway partners, and affiliated projects:
Intractable Conflict Knowledge Base Project
Intractable Conflict Knowledge Base Project

"This knowledge base examines very difficult, destructive, long-lasting conflicts. We explore what makes these conflicts different from other conflicts, and more importantly what can be done to lessen their destructiveness and make them more constructive."

Mohamed Anwar al-Sadat
Mohamed Anwar al-Sadat

Former President of the Arab Republic of Egypt, and 1978 Nobel Peace Laureate