 |
 |
Identity (Inter-Group) Conflicts
Cate Malek
Research Assistant, Conflict Research Consortium
University of Colorado
Based on a longer essay on Identity Issues, written by Louis Kriesberg for the
Intractable Conflict Knowledge Base Project
Definition:
For an "identity" or inter-group conflict to occur, the opponents
must assign an identity to themselves and their adversaries, each side believing
the fight is between "us" and "them." Conflicts where the
antagonists seem to be fighting about their identities are called identity-based
conflicts or inter-group conflicts.
Examples:
Examples of such conflicts include conflicts between blacks and whites about
race-related issues; conflicts between different ethnic groups, religious
groups, conflicts about sexual-orientation, even gender conflicts. However, it
should be noted that not all conflicts between a black person and a white person
are racial conflicts, just as all conflicts between a Catholic and a Protestant
are not religious conflicts, nor all conflicts between a man and a woman gender
conflicts. The conflict might be about some other problem entirely, or (more
problematic) one person may see the conflict as based on race, religion, or
gender, while the other does not.
Description:
Developing a sense of self is essential to become a mature person. Everyone's
self-conception is a unique combination of many identities (i.e. gender,
religion, and family). Identities apply to individuals, but can also be
collective, extending to countries and ethnic communities. People feel injured
when other persons sharing their identity are injured.
Sources of Identity
Identities are constructed from various traits and experiences, many of which
are subject to interpretation. For example, race is an important identity in
some societies, but not others. Some analysts speak of ethnicity as an ancient
and unchanging phenomenon. Others stress that ethnicity is socially constructed,
with people choosing a history and ancestry and creating, as much as
discovering, differences from others.
Many identities are based on shared values, beliefs, or concerns. This
includes religion, political ideologies, nationality, or culture. Since everyone
has multiple identities, their relative importance and compatibility differs in
various times and circumstances.
Destructive Identities
Certain aspects of identities can create intense, destructive conflicts. If
an identity has been heavily reinforced or is highly significant to someone,
such as ethnicity or nationality, then threats to that identity can be hard to
ignore. Cultural patterns in a group can create conflict. These patterns include
a tendency to mistrust other groups or to belittle them. Ideologies also create
conflict. Thus, a group with a racist identity would tend to regard others as
inherently inferior. Sometimes, if a group feels they have been victims of
another group, they can feel threatened. Fearing attacks, they may act to
prevent them, but in ways that threaten the other side. The result can be
self-perpetuating destructive struggles. Also, leaders may benefit from the
construction of exclusive identities, gaining power by arousing emotions against
other groups. Identity is often created by past interactions. If a group is used
to violent, coercive interactions, their identity will tend to celebrate group
members who act tough while simultaneously seeing enemies as cruel and hateful.
Finally, identities are rarely symmetrical. Powerful groups will try to define
other groups. The Nazis' violent imposition of their characterization of who and
what Jews were stands as a grotesque example of that tendency.
Constructive Identities
Being peaceful and loving is also an identity. Parents, religious leaders,
artists, etc. can nurture those qualities in others. Mass media can convey the
humanity and positive perspectives of the "enemy." There are also some
powerful methods of deconstructing negative identities. For example, one side
can reach out to the other to try to alleviate their suffering or to return a
peaceful gesture. In addition, rival leaders or grassroots organizations can
rebel against an uncompromising leader by organizing a peace movement. One
approach is to change the ideologies sustain the conflict. For example, the
Dutch Reformed Church, the church of the Afrikaners of South Africa, ended their
support for apartheid, contributing greatly to apartheid's end. If one side
admits the truth about past injustices and atrocities it can alter their
self-identity. Finally some members of opposing sides usually interact
positively. For example, profitable businesses or collaborations in cultural or
research activities can counter the destructiveness of conflict.
Applications:
Whenever one or all sides of a conflict define the conflict in terms of group
membership, it should be considered, at least in part, an identity-based
conflict. Since identities tend to be very deep-rooted, this makes this kind of
conflict more difficult to resolve, and requires different conflict resolution
techniques to deal with. Rather than simply using integrative bargaining to
divide up material interests, people involved in identity-based conflicts need
to recognize and deal with the identity issues directly. This may involve giving
more recognition to the others' identity and working with them to make that
identity feel secure. This often requires techniques that focus more on
relationship-building, such as dialogue or transformative mediation, as opposed
to simple interest-based mediation to deal with these issues successfully.
Links to Related Articles:
Reconciliation
|
 |
 |
 |