Reconciliation
Cate Malek
Research Assistant, Conflict Research Consortium
University of Colorado
Based on a longer essay on Reconciliation, written by Charles (Chip) Hauss for the Intractable Conflict Knowledge Base Project
"Reconciliation is not about being cozy; it is not about pretending that
things were other than they were. Reconciliation based on falsehood, on not
facing up to reality, is not reconciliation at all." -- Archbishop Desmond
Tutu
Definition:
A process that draws on truth, justice and mercy to turn temporary peace into
a lasting end to a conflict.
Users:
Anyone dealing with lingering emotional burdens from an intense conflict.
Especially if these emotions threaten to restart the conflict.
Description:
Through reconciliation, parties explore and overcome the pain from conflict
and attempt to build trust. Because reconciliation is a new concept in the new
field of conflict resolution, there is no standard definition of it. However,
almost everyone acknowledges that it includes four components identified by John
Paul Lederach: truth, justice, mercy, and peace. Lederach's use of the term
"mercy" hints at religious roots. Reconciliation is present in all the
Abrahamic faiths and is particularly important to Evangelical Christians.
Reconciliation occurs one person at a time and is normally a long, difficult
process. The consequences of not reconciling can be enormous. In peace
researcher Fen Osler Hampson's terms, too many peace agreements are
"orphaned." That is, the parties reach an agreement that stops the
fighting but does little to contribute to stable peace, which can only occur
when the issues that gave rise to the conflict are addressed to the satisfaction
of all. At worst, without reconciliation, the fighting can break out again.
The most famous reconciliation process is South Africa's Truth and
Reconciliation Commission, which held hearings into human rights abuses during
the apartheid era and offered amnesty to people who showed genuine remorse for
their actions. Since the TRC was created in 1995, about 20 other such
commissions have been created
Reconciliation cannot be forced on people. It is a "bottom up"
process and thus cannot be imposed by the state or any other institution.
However, as the South African example shows, governments can do a lot to promote
reconciliation. It is probably even harder for outsiders to spark reconciliation
than it is for governments. Most successful efforts at reconciliation have, in
fact, been led by locals. The TRC was chaired by Desmond Tutu, a black
clergyman, while its vice president was Alex Boraine, a white pastor. Both were
outspoken opponents of apartheid, but they also included whites who had
supported the old regime. However, various NGO's have had some success with
reconciliation efforts in countries like Rwanda and Bosnia.
Even though reconciliation mostly involves people talking to each other, it
is not easy to achieve. Rather, it is among the most difficult things people are
ever called on to do. Victims have to forgive oppressors. The perpetrators of
crimes against humanity have to admit their guilt and their arrogance. It is not
easy to forgive; but it is also clear how far doing so relieves the pain people
have carried inside them for years.
Examples:
One example is the remarkable documentary, "Long Night's Journey Into
Day," about four cases considered by the South African Truth and
Reconciliation committee. One involved a black police officer who lured seven
activists into a trap where they were all killed by the authorities. The last
scene, shows a meeting he held with the mothers of the seven boys where he begs
for forgiveness. It is clear that his remorse is heart-felt. At first, the
mothers, whose pain remains raw, refuse to forgive him. Then, one of them asks
if his first name means "prayer" and when he says it does, you can
literally watch the mothers draw on their own Christianity and find the mental
space to forgive the former officer.
Applications:
Reconciliation is important in any deep-rooted conflict when the parties need
to live or work together in the future. Even if they do not, the apology and
forgiveness necessary for reconciliation can help heal internal wounds and allow
parties to recover from the trauma of the conflict and move forward more
positively into their future life.
Links to Related Articles:
Identity (Inter-Group) Conflicts
|