 |
 |
Article Summary of "Culture and Conflict" by Paul Kimmel
Citation: Kimmel, Paul. "Culture and Conflict." Morton Deutsch and Peter T. Coleman, eds., The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2000 pp. 453-474.
This Article Summary written by: Conflict Research Consortium Staff
"Culture" refers to shared sets of meanings, norms,
expectations, perceptions, roles, categories, interpretations, and modes of
communication. Culture shapes one's view of reality, and it is shared culture
that allows people to assume that they share the same reality. Interactions
between people of different cultures can be fraught with difficulty and
misunderstanding, particularly when the participants fail to recognize that they
effectively occupy different realities. In order to relate to each other
effectively, culturally diverse actors must develop a shared
microculture.
Kimmel begins by explaining some of the basic concepts used
in the study of intercultural communication. Subjective culture refers to the
norms, perceptions, expectations and so on, of an individual; it refers to their
(usually unconscious) mindset. A person's subjective culture serves as an
interpretive screen by which she makes sense of the outside world. People
acquire their subjective culture through socialization, and that mindset comes
to seem the natural, normal, and correct way to view the world. What are
actually particular cultural norms are though of as simply common sense. Other
ways of interpreting the outside world, when they are even recognized to exist,
are dismissed as wrong or inferior. Individuals come to identify with the
larger common culture that gave rise to their mindset. They develop a cultural
identity.
Since one's own mindset seems normal and natural, most
people find it difficult to accept that others could have very different
mindsets. Most people assume that others think in broadly the same ways that
they do. When another person's behavior does not fit our notions of "normal"
behavior, we generally assume that that person is misbehaving, unreasonable or
even bad. Attribution error refers to the tendency to attribute "inappropriate"
behavior to negative character traits, rather than to situational or cultural
differences. These supposed negative character traits usually reflect our own
cultural stereotypes.
Methods of reasoning, evaluating and deciding differ across
cultures. Some cultures favor intuitive reasoning based on principle and
precedent, while others rely on observation and experience-based conceptual
reasoning. They differ in tolerance of uncertainty and in what they consider to
be valid information.
Cultures also differ in their style of communications.
High-context cultures rely on the context to convey most of the information,
with relatively little information conveyed by the actual message. Low-context
cultures convey most of the information within the message, with very little
significance given to the context. Low-context listeners often miss the full
content of high-context communication, while high-context listeners may read in
more content than a low-context speaker intended.
With training people can learn to communicate effectively
across cultural differences. Levels of cultural awareness range from cultural
chauvinism and ethnocentrism, through tolerance and attempts to minimize
difference, to understanding that there are fundamental, yet explainable,
differences between cultures. Trainees need to learn how to learn about cultural
differences. To do this they "must be taught less-culture-specific skills by
someone who understands [their] culture and the other culture(s) in
question."(p. 463) Intercultural role playing exercises can help people
recognize their own cultural assumptions, increase their level of cultural
awareness, and learn how to learn about cultural differences. The goal is to
enable people to understand other cultures, shift their own cultural mindset,
and create microcultures to sustain effective communication.
Kimmel examines the implications of cultural difference for
conflict management. Problem solving benefits from having a wide array of
perspectives available. Intercultural training helps negotiators understand each
other's different perspectives. Microcultures benefit from including elements
from various cultural types. Low-context , conceptual communication is best for
conveying information, while high context communication is more appropriate for
relationship building.
Discussions between people who can shift their cultural
mindset s take the form of constructive controversies, in which the parties seek
to clearly present their own values and assumptions, and to understand them in
relation to the other party's interests. Constructive controversy between
members of different cultures requires intercultural exploration, and promotes
peace building. Peace building demands modesty and graciousness, and follows the
Platinum Rule: "Do unto others as they would do for themselves if they
could."(p. 469)
Kimmel cautions against inappropriate reliance on
theoretical models of essential human needs. "The greatest danger in being
oblivious to the impact of one's own culture when building a theory to explain
human behavior lies in promoting one's own cultural beliefs to the status of
formalized 'scientific knowledge'."(p. 471) Different cultures understand their
needs in very different ways. Kimmel argues that most international conflicts
are grounded in different views of the nature of social reality, that is, in
different cultures' different understandings of their needs and the world around
them.
|
 |
 |
 |